|
|
|
|
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 29, 2008
Revised on October 14, 2008
Accepted on November 3, 2008

*Center for Developmental Biology, Riken , Kobe 650-0047, Japan;
Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
Monitoring Editor: Thomas D. Pollard
Myosin VI is a pointed-end directed actin motor that is thought to function as both a transporter of cargoes and an anchor, capable of binding cellular components to actin for long periods of time. Dimerization via a predicted coiled coil was hypothesized to regulate activity and motor properties. However, the importance of the coiled-coil sequence has not been tested in vivo. We used myosin VIs well-defined role in actin stabilization during Drosophila spermatid individualization to test the importance in vivo of the predicted coiled coil. If myosin VI functions as a dimer, a forced dimer should fully rescue myosin VI loss of function defects, including actin stabilization, actin cone movement, and cytoplasmic exclusion by the cones. Conversely, a molecule lacking the coiled coil should not rescue at all. Surprisingly, neither prediction was correct, as each rescued partially and the molecule lacking the coiled coil functioned better than the forced dimer. In extracts, no cross-linking into higher molecular weight forms indicative of dimerization was observed. In addition, a sequence required for altering nucleotide kinetics to make myosin VI dimers processive is not required for myosin VIs actin stabilization function. We conclude that myosin VI does not need to dimerize via the predicted coiled coil to stabilize actin in vivo.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Address correspondence to:
Kathryn G. Miller (miller{at}biology.wustl.edu)